Monday, June 13, 2005

Sun & StorageTek

So a lot of people have been asking me lately, what do "you" think of the Sun & StorageTek merger (see the disclaimer below).

Contrary to what people might think, I believe Sun is a great company at its heart. I think Sun has somewhat lost its way over the last couple years but that was only a function of a number of shifting forces colliding in one place (dot-com bust, migration to ISS x86 as a platform, adoption of Linux, Windows/Microsoft stability etc..).

While Sun has been restructuring, they claim to have finally seen the light. The jury is out still as to this being a lasting phenomenon.

So lets talk about StorageTek and Sun and the Kyle prediction ;-)

Sun needs a sales team, and a really tough one. They used to have this back in the glory days (remember Masood Jabbar) and they need one again. StorageTek brings this to them in full force. You could argue this point one of two ways; The StorageTek sales force is great at "selling" a dying product and thus extending its life, or Sun can benefit from the great Enterprise Sales experience these folks would bring to them.

Verdict: StorageTek brings a tough sales force to Sun


Sun needs a way to be competitive in the Enterprise space. If you look at history, you realize that Sun is a relative newcomer to the top 3 (lets exclude Dell because...well...being an Intel reseller doesn't count). HP and IBM have spent years becoming de facto choices for enterprise customers. With both of these vendors there were lines like "you can't get fired for buying HP or IBM". With Sparc dying a sudden death and a "new" strategy focused around x86, Sun really was missing that long reach technology that provides them the image of stability (the thing Enterprises really care about). StorageTek brings this to them. Tape may be a very old technology, but its still there.

Finally, Sun really needs new blood that is not based in California. I personally believe 3/4 of Sun's problems come from being based in California. They are trying to play the same game as everyone else with less mindshare, more skepticism and less morale. Sun can now (with StorageTek) focus their operations in areas such as Colorado, Boston, Austin etc.. where there is still plenty of "tech" investment, but without the crutches of the silicon valley grind. Scott and Jonathan might be great leaders, but they certainly aren't innovating and changing the game the way they used to. I would argue that one of Sun's smartest moves was their SmallWorks project based in Aspen (run by Bill Joy). A group of western cowboys figuring out how to build an innovative solution might be just what Sun needs.

Yes I think its a good merger, even considering their history screwing things up (Cobalt). Let's see if they can pull this one off ;-)




The views expressed here are mine alone and do not express the view of AMD or its partners & affiliates

2 Comments:

At 2:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is an ptimistic view at best. Sun should be chopped up into small little pieces and given away to the highest bidder.

 
At 5:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would agree that Sun has many assets:
some good people
good-enough technology
a broad customer base.

StorageTek brings additional customers, and a sales force.

StorageTek has suffered from even worse management over the past five years than Sun, if that's possible.

Sun has to change from a technology-driven company to a customer-driven company.

It needs to phase out SPARC over the next five years, keeping it alive only for the sake of its intalled base. Other than for them, SPARC is dead. Sun needs to recognize this, mourn, and get past it.

With John Fowler and Andy B, Sun has a strong team building products using the best 64-bit chips now available, the Opteron family from AMD. Sun needs to deepen their commitment to Opteron and AMD. They could collaborate with AMD to make future Opteron generations even better. Why aren't they?

Sun also needs to stop playing games with Linux. Many customers like it and want it and use it. Sun should embrace those customers, and become the best Linux hardware vendor. Make those customers happy. Help make Linux better for everybody. NFS in Linux is not so good? Sun, step up to the plate and fix it. Make it first class. Otherwise, it's not Linux that looks bad, it's NFS that looks bad.

That's not to say Sun shouldn't continue to make Solaris better too. Solaris is a great operating system. As customers get more familiar with Linux, they can't help but be more and more impressed with the premium features in Solaris. As the world continues to move towards x86 everywhere, Solaris can continue to have a big role. But let the customers choose Solaris because it offers compelling advantages over Linux. Don't denigrate Linux to try to pitch Solaris - that just insults your customers.

Also, Sun, find a CEO and a President your customers can respect. Scott and Ponytail make Sun look bad, and make customers ignore the good that Sun has to offer.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home